Patterns
Analytics
Temporal, spatial and meteorological patterns across the complaint corpus. Selecting a reported odor location cross-filters every chart, the source patterns and the map.
Reported Odor Location
Where the reporter said the odor was coming from. Click a category to cross-filter.
Complaints Shown
0
With Candidate Sources
0
Pump Station #1
0
Treatment Facility #1
0
Complaints by Year
Complaints by Month
Complaints by Hour
Complaints by Day of Week
Complaints by Neighborhood (top 15)
Wind Direction (from)
Wind Speed
Screening Validation
Candidate availability
Where both classes qualify, a pump station ranks #1 in 0% of cases and a treatment facility in 0%.
Distance & alignment by candidate type
| Type | #1 | Median dist. | Median angle | Strong |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wind-informed screening selects a different individual asset than simple nearest-asset proximity for 0% of screenable complaints. This shows wind changes which asset is prioritized; it is not a measure of accuracy.
High-Consistency Matches
iA restrictive screening subset — within 1 mile, within 15° of directly upwind, wind at least 3 mph. It is a screening filter, not a confirmed source.
Assets with the most High-Consistency Matches
Reported odor location vs candidate type
| Reported location | Complaints | Pump station #1 | Treatment #1 | No candidate |
|---|
Reported odor location is a citizen-reported observation point, not a measured emission source, and shows no strong association with candidate type.
Potential Source Patterns
Aggregated from the same complaint-level screening results used on the map. Consistency with wind and distance is not evidence of causation.
| Asset | Type | High-Consistencyi | Median dist. (#1) | Median angle (#1) | Strong % | #1 matchesi | Candidate matches | Median wind | Calm-wind | Dominant wind |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No wastewater assets met the screening criteria for the current selection. | ||||||||||